NBIZ vs. EMTY
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - NBIZ tracks the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.
Performance
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -37.07%
- 6M
- -98.00%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EMTY
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- -0.27%
- 3Y*
- -3.37%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.44K | $30.35K | $49.16K | |
| $76.41M | $57.60M | $42.81M |
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -97.27% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and EMTY is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMTY
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and EMTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -77.62% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.41% | -75.61% | -22.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.23% | -54.65% | -22.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.54% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 237.50% | 18.41% | +219.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 22.46% | +215.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 25.60% | +211.90% |
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
NBIZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.33% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and EMTY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for NBIZ.
NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.66% for EMTY.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and EMTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer