PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIZ vs. EMTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIZ

1D
-2.71%
1M
-37.07%
6M
-98.00%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EMTY

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.72%
6M
2.65%
YTD
-2.27%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.37%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.44K$30.35K$49.16K
$76.41M$57.60M$42.81M

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIZ and EMTY is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIZ vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EMTY
EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBIZEMTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and EMTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIZEMTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.41%

-77.62%

-20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.41%

-75.61%

-22.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.23%

-54.65%

-22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

Volatility

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIZEMTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

237.50%

18.41%

+219.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

237.50%

22.46%

+215.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

237.50%

25.60%

+211.90%

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIZ vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison

NBIZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMTY
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF
3.33%3.83%6.00%4.41%0.65%0.00%0.07%0.82%0.62%0.03%
NBIZ
Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIZ and EMTY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.

EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for NBIZ.

NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.66% for EMTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIZ and EMTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer