PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. SRFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. SRFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 177.59% return, which is significantly higher than SRFM's -44.33% return.


NBIS

1D
4.55%
1M
12.10%
YTD
177.59%
6M
164.98%
1Y
362.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SRFM

1D
-2.70%
1M
-12.90%
YTD
-44.33%
6M
-48.57%
1Y
-51.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIS vs. SRFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
177.59%202.18%46.25%
SRFM
Surf Air Mobility Inc.
-44.33%-64.01%186.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and SRFM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.34

Fundamentals

EPS

NBIS:

$3.17

SRFM:

-$7.17

PS Ratio

NBIS:

69.73

SRFM:

0.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

SRFM:

$108.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

SRFM:

$5.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

SRFM:

-$74.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. SRFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SRFM
SRFM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SRFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SRFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRFM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIS vs. SRFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBISSRFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.03

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.03

-0.59

+8.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

-0.76

+19.11

NBIS vs. SRFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the SRFM Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and SRFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. SRFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum SRFM drawdown of -97.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and SRFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISSRFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-97.29%

+39.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.47%

-88.30%

+42.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.15%

-96.91%

+84.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-87.68%

+68.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.86%

67.54%

-47.68%

Volatility

NBIS vs. SRFM - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 30.23% compared to Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) at 16.48%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISSRFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.23%

16.48%

+13.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.43%

70.39%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.41%

148.04%

-43.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.20%

152.04%

-41.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.20%

152.04%

-41.84%

Dividends

NBIS vs. SRFM - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIS nor SRFM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NBIS vs. SRFM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Surf Air Mobility Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
399.00M
25.61M
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(SRFM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and SRFM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to SRFM (16.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs SRFM's -97.29%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and SRFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer