NBIS vs. IPRP.L
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock, while IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) is REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Over the past year, NBIS returned 393.02% vs 1.07% for IPRP.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NBIS is traded in USD, while IPRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IPRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 177.59% return, which is significantly higher than IPRP.L's 0.02% return.
NBIS
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 177.59%
- 6M
- 164.98%
- 1Y
- 393.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 1.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.35%
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 177.59% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 22.21% | -12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and IPRP.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. IPRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
IPRP.L
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIS | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.01 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.03 | -0.02 | +8.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | -0.05 | +18.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -73.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and IPRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -73.26% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -17.54% | -27.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -26.11% | +13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -20.10% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.86% | 7.11% | +12.75% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 30.23% compared to iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) at 4.94%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.23% | 4.94% | +25.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.43% | 14.03% | +57.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.41% | 16.94% | +87.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 24.17% | +86.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 21.42% | +88.78% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison
NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.50% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and IPRP.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and IPRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer