NBIS vs. CMCX.L
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) and CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) are both stocks. NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CMCX.L operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past year, NBIS returned 451.81% vs 89.33% for CMCX.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NBIS is traded in USD, while CMCX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMCX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 210.70% return, which is significantly higher than CMCX.L's 53.37% return.
NBIS
- 1D
- 11.93%
- 1M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 210.70%
- 6M
- 220.52%
- 1Y
- 451.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMCX.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 22.24%
- YTD
- 53.37%
- 6M
- 63.92%
- 1Y
- 89.33%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 210.70% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 53.37% | 36.76% | -28.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and CMCX.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
NBIS:
$80.35B
CMCX.L:
£1.29B
NBIS:
$3.17
CMCX.L:
£0.50
NBIS:
81.92
CMCX.L:
9.27
NBIS:
28.15
CMCX.L:
1.22
NBIS:
78.04
CMCX.L:
1.68
NBIS:
11.10
CMCX.L:
2.82
NBIS:
$877.90M
CMCX.L:
£755.33M
NBIS:
$420.60M
CMCX.L:
£533.42M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
CMCX.L:
£232.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. CMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
CMCX.L
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIS | CMCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.02 | 4.39 | +5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.89 | 11.30 | +11.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum CMCX.L drawdown of -82.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and CMCX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | CMCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -82.48% | +24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -20.24% | -25.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.77% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -43.79% | +24.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.86% | 7.87% | +11.99% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 31.57% compared to CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) at 17.64%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | CMCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.57% | 17.64% | +13.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.21% | 25.53% | +46.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.96% | 43.39% | +61.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.40% | 48.24% | +62.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.40% | 47.85% | +62.55% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Dividend Comparison
NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 3.00% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 5.53% | 9.46% | 5.47% | 2.41% | 6.94% | 5.95% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NBIS vs. CMCX.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and CMC Markets plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and CMCX.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and CMCX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer