NBIL vs. TERG
NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
NBIL vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 462.18% return, which is significantly higher than TERG's 229.64% return.
NBIL
- 1D
- -7.17%
- 1M
- 83.16%
- YTD
- 462.18%
- 6M
- 280.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- 39.95%
- YTD
- 229.64%
- 6M
- 218.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 462.18% | -14.36% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 229.64% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIL and TERG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIL vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 9.90 | -8.60 |
Drawdowns
NBIL vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.87% | -49.52% | -28.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -15.98% | +6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -13.73% | -31.17% |
Volatility
NBIL vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.38% | 139.25% | +60.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 139.25% | +60.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 139.25% | +60.13% |
NBIL vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIL vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIL nor TERG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIL and TERG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
NBIL and TERG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for NBIL and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer