NBIL vs. SPUU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NBIL is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.

Performance

NBIL vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 272.68% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.67% return.

NBIL

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -12.64%
• 6M: 176.66%
• YTD: 272.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPUU

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 4.80%
• 6M: 15.49%
• YTD: 19.67%
• 1Y: 40.22%
• 3Y*: 35.03%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: 24.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIL vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	272.68%	-65.28%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	19.67%	1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIL and SPUU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

NBIL vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPUU

SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 56
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIL vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBIL	SPUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.99	—

Drawdowns

NBIL vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and SPUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBIL	SPUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.87%	-59.35%	-18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.63%	-1.40%	-45.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.31%	-9.46%	-32.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBIL	SPUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	201.96%	25.21%	+176.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	201.96%	33.67%	+168.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	201.96%	35.74%	+166.22%

NBIL vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBIL vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

NBIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	1.31%	1.63%	0.55%	0.83%	0.88%	3.04%	8.03%	1.80%	5.50%	6.96%	8.08%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBIL and SPUU in my portfolio?

NBIL and SPUU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBIL or SPUU?

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBIL or SPUU?

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBIL or SPUU?

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for NBIL.

What is the main difference between NBIL and SPUU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.60% for SPUU.