PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIL vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIL vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 133.11% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -30.21% return.


NBIL

1D
2.88%
1M
-36.49%
6M
140.41%
YTD
133.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NVD

1D
-5.85%
1M
-9.27%
6M
-25.85%
YTD
-30.21%
1Y
-45.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-78.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$101.88M$87.37M$73.33M
$448.34M$392.73M$345.88M

NBIL vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIL and NVD is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

-0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIL vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIL vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBILNVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

NBIL vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIL vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and NVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBILNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.84%

-99.26%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.62%

-99.06%

+32.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.76%

-82.49%

+38.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.25%

Volatility

NBIL vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBILNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

216.76%

73.16%

+143.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

216.76%

92.05%

+124.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

216.76%

92.05%

+124.71%

NBIL vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBIL and NVD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

NBIL vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

NBIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.95%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NBIL
GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
16.95%11.83%8.68%15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIL and NVD have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIL and NVD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 16.95%, compared with 0.00% for NBIL.

NBIL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIL and NVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer