NBIIX vs. NGUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX).
NBIIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jun 16, 2005. NGUAX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jun 1, 1950.
Performance
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIIX Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund | -6.74% | 13.56% | 5.34% | 14.28% | -22.00% | 13.85% | 13.89% | 27.89% | -16.45% | 27.16% |
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund | -11.52% | 14.38% | 23.80% | 35.98% | -24.47% | 27.43% | 34.56% | 36.69% | -7.16% | 25.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIIX achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly higher than NGUAX's -11.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIIX has underperformed NGUAX with an annualized return of 5.79%, while NGUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.
NBIIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -10.33%
- 1Y
- -0.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
NGUAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than NGUAX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBIIX vs. NGUAX — Risk / Return Rank
NBIIX
NGUAX
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBIIX | NGUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | 0.53 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 0.92 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.50 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 1.74 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIIX | NGUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 0.53 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.53 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.78 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.04 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIIX and NGUAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Dividend Comparison
NBIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.04%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIIX Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.56% | 2.54% | 5.40% | 11.99% | 4.84% | 2.72% | 1.43% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.28% |
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund | 14.04% | 12.43% | 6.01% | 4.30% | 6.62% | 10.92% | 7.60% | 6.21% | 11.21% | 6.87% | 13.11% | 12.82% |
Drawdowns
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, smaller than the maximum NGUAX drawdown of -78.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIIX and NGUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIIX | NGUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -78.07% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -14.16% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.20% | -28.43% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.20% | -31.99% | -3.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.10% | -14.16% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -31.98% | +18.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 4.09% | +0.26% |
Volatility
NBIIX vs. NGUAX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) at 4.85%. This indicates that NBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NGUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBIIX | NGUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 4.85% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 10.00% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 19.57% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 18.16% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 18.20% | -1.07% |