NGUAX vs. JNRFX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NGUAX (Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund) and JNRFX (Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NGUAX returned 15.45%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for JNRFX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NGUAX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for JNRFX.

Performance

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGUAX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than JNRFX's 2.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NGUAX having a 15.45% annualized return and JNRFX not far ahead at 15.63%.

NGUAX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 4.24%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 1Y: 9.19%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 15.45%
• ALL TIME*: 8.21%

JNRFX

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -2.01%
• 6M: 3.74%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 1Y: 9.40%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 15.63%
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JNRFX Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund	3.54%	14.38%	23.80%	35.98%	-24.47%	27.43%	34.56%	36.69%	-7.16%	25.28%
JNRFX Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D	2.45%	18.45%	35.13%	43.14%	-29.96%	20.19%	32.82%	35.40%	-2.73%	25.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NGUAX and JNRFX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1993	0.89

The correlation between NGUAX and JNRFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NGUAX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NGUAX

NGUAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
NGUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NGUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NGUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NGUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
NGUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

JNRFX

JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 9
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NGUAX	JNRFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.39	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	0.67	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	0.42	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.71	1.35	+0.36

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGUAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGUAX and JNRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGUAX drawdown since its inception was -78.07%, roughly equal to the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGUAX and JNRFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NGUAX	JNRFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.07%	-74.74%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.16%	-17.05%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.89%	-22.66%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.43%	-36.48%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.99%	-36.48%	+4.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-6.44%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.77%	-24.86%	-6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	5.35%	-1.03%

Volatility

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) is 4.58%, while Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D (JNRFX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that NGUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NGUAX	JNRFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	6.94%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	15.33%	-3.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.67%	18.52%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	22.44%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	21.49%	-3.18%

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGUAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than JNRFX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

NGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than JNRFX's 11.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNRFX Janus Henderson Research Fund Class D	11.65%	11.94%	5.11%	2.93%	0.43%	13.01%	2.98%	10.37%	11.06%	8.22%	5.41%	9.21%
NGUAX Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund	12.00%	12.43%	6.01%	4.30%	6.62%	10.92%	7.60%	6.21%	11.21%	6.87%	13.11%	12.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NGUAX and JNRFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, NGUAX and JNRFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NGUAX or JNRFX?

JNRFX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to NGUAX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGUAX dropped -78.07% vs JNRFX's -74.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NGUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.