PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGUAX vs. JNRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
-8.55%14.38%23.80%35.98%-24.47%27.43%34.56%36.69%-7.16%25.28%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
-10.67%18.45%35.13%43.14%-29.96%20.19%32.82%35.40%-2.73%25.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGUAX achieves a -8.55% return, which is significantly higher than JNRFX's -10.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NGUAX having a 14.49% annualized return and JNRFX not far ahead at 14.57%.


NGUAX

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-8.55%
6M
-8.31%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
14.49%

JNRFX

1D
3.86%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-10.67%
6M
-10.21%
1Y
15.96%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGUAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than JNRFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NGUAX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGUAX
NGUAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NGUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NGUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

JNRFX
JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGUAXJNRFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.76

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.99

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.76

3.52

-0.76

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGUAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGUAX and JNRFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NGUAXJNRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.76

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.69

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.44

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NGUAX and JNRFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

NGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.59%, more than JNRFX's 13.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
13.59%12.43%6.01%4.30%6.62%10.92%7.60%6.21%11.21%6.87%13.11%12.82%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
13.36%11.94%5.11%2.93%0.43%13.01%2.98%10.37%11.06%8.22%5.41%9.21%

Drawdowns

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGUAX drawdown since its inception was -78.07%, roughly equal to the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGUAX and JNRFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NGUAXJNRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.07%

-74.74%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-17.05%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-36.48%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.99%

-36.48%

+4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.29%

-13.85%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-25.07%

-6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

4.78%

-0.72%

Volatility

NGUAX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) is 6.08%, while Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that NGUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NGUAXJNRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

7.06%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

12.64%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

22.52%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

22.03%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

21.27%

-3.04%