NBIG vs. STRL
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIG vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 354.99% return, which is significantly higher than STRL's 180.50% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- 8.60%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 354.99%
- 6M
- 298.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 323.17%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
NBIG vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 354.99% | -59.80% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | -19.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and STRL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STRL
NBIG vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -92.51% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.62% | -13.56% | -12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.11% | -46.29% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.30% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 65.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.15% | 82.41% | +117.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.15% | 57.29% | +142.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.15% | 53.58% | +146.57% |
Dividends
NBIG vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIG nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and STRL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer