NBIG vs. LDRI
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while LDRI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. NBIG is actively managed, while LDRI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. NBIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LDRI.
Performance
NBIG vs. LDRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 565.40% return, which is significantly higher than LDRI's 1.37% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 60.92%
- YTD
- 565.40%
- 6M
- 432.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG vs. LDRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 565.40% | -59.80% |
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 1.37% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and LDRI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. LDRI — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDRI
NBIG vs. LDRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. LDRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than LDRI's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and LDRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -0.85% | -74.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -0.58% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.91% | -0.20% | -40.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. LDRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.52% | 1.96% | +197.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.52% | 2.29% | +197.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.52% | 2.29% | +197.23% |
NBIG vs. LDRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRI's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIG vs. LDRI - Dividend Comparison
NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 3.54% | 4.23% | 0.83% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and LDRI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NBIG.
LDRI has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
NBIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LDRI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 0.10% for LDRI.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and LDRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer