PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIG vs. DABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIG vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 526.74% return, which is significantly higher than DABS's 1.10% return.


NBIG

1D
-5.81%
1M
51.57%
YTD
526.74%
6M
438.77%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DABS

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIG vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIG and DABS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIG vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIG vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBIGDABSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

NBIG vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIG vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and DABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIGDABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-1.47%

-74.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-0.27%

-7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-0.31%

-40.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

Volatility

NBIG vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIGDABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

199.11%

2.46%

+196.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.11%

2.55%

+196.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.11%

2.55%

+196.56%

NBIG vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIG vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBIG and DABS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NBIG.

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

NBIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 0.40% for DABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIG and DABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer