PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIE vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIE vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIE

1D
0.85%
1M
3.64%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.19%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIE vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIE and VEA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIE vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIE

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIE vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIE vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIEVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.25

+1.05

Drawdowns

NBIE vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIEVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-60.68%

+54.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-13.29%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

Volatility

NBIE vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIEVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

15.64%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

16.54%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.35%

+2.37%

NBIE vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIE vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBIE
Neuberger International Core Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.61%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NBIE and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NBIE.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.03% for VEA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIE and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer