NBIE vs. VEA
NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NBIE is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBIE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
NBIE vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
NBIE vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 5.64% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIE and VEA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIE vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
NBIE
VEA
NBIE vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.25 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
NBIE vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -60.68% | +54.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.66% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -13.29% | +11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
NBIE vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 15.64% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 16.54% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 17.35% | +2.37% |
NBIE vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIE vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.61% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, NBIE and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NBIE.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.03% for VEA.
Find the right allocation for NBIE and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer