NBIE vs. RODM
NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NBIE is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
NBIE vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
NBIE vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 5.95% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIE and RODM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIE vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
NBIE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RODM
NBIE vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIE vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -35.98% | +30.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -2.34% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -6.35% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
NBIE vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIE | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 10.94% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 13.45% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 15.07% | +4.77% |
NBIE vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NBIE and RODM have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
NBIE vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.83% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NBIE and RODM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIE and RODM have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Hartford.
Find the right allocation for NBIE and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer