NBIE vs. FDT
NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NBIE is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBIE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
NBIE vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 44.07%
- 3Y*
- 27.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
NBIE vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 5.95% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIE and FDT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIE vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
NBIE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDT
NBIE vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIE | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIE vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIE | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -46.10% | +40.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -5.81% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -10.75% | +9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
NBIE vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIE | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 20.20% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 18.58% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 18.54% | +1.30% |
NBIE vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIE vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIE and FDT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.80% for FDT.
Find the right allocation for NBIE and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer