NBHIX vs. NMANX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX).
NBHIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Nov 2, 2006. NMANX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 1, 1979.
Performance
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBHIX Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund | 4.65% | 17.69% | 13.38% | 3.87% | -4.24% | 21.67% | 3.00% | 21.52% | -5.57% | 13.26% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | -4.02% | 5.51% | 24.39% | 18.21% | -28.82% | 12.42% | 39.45% | 33.62% | -6.28% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBHIX achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly higher than NMANX's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, NBHIX has underperformed NMANX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while NMANX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.19% annualized return.
NBHIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
NMANX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBHIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NMANX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBHIX vs. NMANX — Risk / Return Rank
NBHIX
NMANX
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.43 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.76 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.63 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 1.95 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.43 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.12 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.50 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBHIX and NMANX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Dividend Comparison
NBHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than NMANX's 24.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBHIX Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund | 1.52% | 1.54% | 7.09% | 6.16% | 7.83% | 10.73% | 2.18% | 5.75% | 7.71% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 6.72% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | 24.06% | 23.10% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 4.87% | 16.30% | 9.58% | 5.43% | 11.70% | 8.94% | 5.00% | 9.00% |
Drawdowns
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.07%, smaller than the maximum NMANX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBHIX and NMANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.07% | -72.14% | +32.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -17.71% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | -38.10% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.97% | -38.10% | +4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -13.21% | +7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -17.45% | +12.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 5.71% | -3.27% |
Volatility
NBHIX vs. NMANX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) is 4.38%, while Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that NBHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 8.86% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 16.46% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 23.80% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 23.15% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 22.36% | -7.64% |