PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBHIX vs. NLSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBHIX achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NBHIX has outperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 9.41%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.


NBHIX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
5.49%
6M
5.77%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.41%

NLSIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.83%
YTD
2.54%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBHIX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund
5.49%17.69%13.38%3.87%-4.24%21.67%3.00%21.52%-5.57%13.26%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.54%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NBHIX and NLSIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between NBHIX and NLSIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBHIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBHIX
NBHIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NBHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NBHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBHIXNLSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.96

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.55

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

5.99

-0.44

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBHIX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBHIXNLSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.85

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.94

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.96

-0.44

Drawdowns

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.07%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBHIX and NLSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBHIXNLSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.07%

-14.75%

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-4.39%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-6.90%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-10.79%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-14.75%

-19.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-0.39%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-2.02%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.13%

+1.43%

Volatility

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.40%. This indicates that NBHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBHIXNLSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

1.40%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

3.92%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

4.92%

+5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

6.66%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

7.32%

+7.43%

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBHIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBHIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

NBHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBHIX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund
1.51%1.54%7.09%6.16%7.83%10.73%2.18%5.75%7.71%6.77%5.92%6.72%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBHIX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBHIX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to NLSIX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBHIX dropped -40.07% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

NBHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBHIX and NLSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer