NBGX vs. NBIE
NBGX (Neuberger Growth ETF) and NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger, while NBIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBGX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for NBIE.
Performance
NBGX vs. NBIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBGX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBGX vs. NBIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 11.02% |
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 5.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBGX and NBIE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBGX vs. NBIE — Risk / Return Rank
NBGX
NBIE
NBGX vs. NBIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Growth ETF (NBGX) and Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBGX | NBIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBGX | NBIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.30 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
NBGX vs. NBIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBGX drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than NBIE's maximum drawdown of -5.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGX and NBIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBGX | NBIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -5.76% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | 0.00% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -1.59% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | — | — |
Volatility
NBGX vs. NBIE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBGX | NBIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 19.72% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 19.72% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 19.72% | +0.24% |
NBGX vs. NBIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBGX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBGX vs. NBIE - Dividend Comparison
NBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NBGX Neuberger Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% |
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBGX and NBIE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for NBGX.
NBGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.
NBGX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NBIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for NBGX and 0.29% for NBIE.
Find the right allocation for NBGX and NBIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer