NBGNX vs. RYWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX).
NBGNX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 27, 1988. RYWCX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004.
Performance
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 1.64% | -4.70% | 9.04% | 15.57% | -19.49% | 18.07% | 24.86% | 29.47% | -6.91% | 15.83% |
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 5.56% | 7.76% | 7.20% | 17.03% | -30.33% | 16.37% | 15.23% | 11.58% | -9.55% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than RYWCX's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.
NBGNX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
RYWCX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBGNX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank
NBGNX
RYWCX
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBGNX | RYWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 0.94 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 1.48 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.56 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 6.45 | -5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBGNX | RYWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.94 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.00 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.26 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.24 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBGNX and RYWCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison
NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.09%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 16.09% | 16.36% | 2.15% | 3.03% | 11.05% | 10.92% | 3.84% | 5.82% | 12.24% | 13.89% | 11.21% | 18.52% |
RYWCX Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 59.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.26% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and RYWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBGNX | RYWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -60.64% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -8.49% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -40.28% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.53% | -54.65% | +20.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.42% | -8.02% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -13.54% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 3.26% | +1.00% |
Volatility
NBGNX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) is 5.66%, while Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that NBGNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBGNX | RYWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 8.13% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 13.78% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 22.53% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 22.96% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 24.69% | -4.50% |