NBGNX vs. NMANX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBGNX (Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund) and NMANX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NBGNX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while NMANX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX returned 8.99%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for NMANX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBGNX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for NMANX.

Performance

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than NMANX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has underperformed NMANX with an annualized return of 8.99%, while NMANX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.

NBGNX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

NMANX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 11.45%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	6.50%	-4.70%	9.04%	15.57%	-19.49%	18.07%	24.86%	29.47%	-6.91%	15.83%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	11.53%	5.51%	24.39%	18.21%	-28.82%	12.42%	39.45%	33.62%	-6.28%	29.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGNX and NMANX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 1988	0.82

The correlation between NBGNX and NMANX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NBGNX vs. NMANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGNX

NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 7
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NMANX

NMANX Risk / Return Rank: 7
NMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBGNX	NMANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.60	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	0.96	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.11	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	0.69	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.25	2.01	+0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the NMANX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGNX and NMANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBGNX	NMANX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	0.60	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.28	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.56	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.52	+0.13

Drawdowns

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum NMANX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and NMANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBGNX	NMANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	-72.14%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-17.71%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.51%	-25.93%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.33%	-38.10%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.53%	-38.10%	+3.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	0.00%	-9.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-17.41%	+10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	6.05%	-2.06%

Volatility

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) is 4.06%, while Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that NBGNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBGNX	NMANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	5.21%	-1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.31%	16.07%	-4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.04%	20.33%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.66%	23.20%	-3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	22.47%	-2.25%

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NMANX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBGNX vs. NMANX - Dividend Comparison

NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, less than NMANX's 20.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund	15.36%	16.36%	2.15%	3.03%	11.05%	10.92%	3.84%	5.82%	12.24%	13.89%	11.21%	18.52%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	20.71%	23.10%	9.85%	3.19%	4.87%	16.30%	9.58%	5.43%	11.70%	8.94%	5.00%	9.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBGNX and NMANX in my portfolio?

NBGNX and NMANX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBGNX or NMANX?

NMANX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to NBGNX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGNX dropped -51.75% vs NMANX's -72.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.