NBDS vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBDS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBDS returned 32.93% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NBDS charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

NBDS vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

NBDS

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.92%
• 1Y: 32.93%
• 3Y*: 22.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBDS vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	19.24%	19.58%	17.97%	18.33%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and BAMU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between NBDS and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NBDS vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 32
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBDS vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBDS	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	5.01	-3.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	8.84	-7.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.43	-1.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	24.72	-23.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	97.90	-94.30

NBDS vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBDS and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.93%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBDS	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.93%	-0.36%	-29.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.96%	-0.12%	-23.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.49%	-0.02%	-9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.19%	0.03%	+9.16%

Volatility

NBDS vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that NBDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBDS	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.27%	0.09%	+11.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.46%	0.40%	+21.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.43%	0.58%	+25.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	0.87%	+27.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	0.87%	+27.04%

NBDS vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBDS vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

NBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBDS and BAMU in my portfolio?

NBDS and BAMU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBDS or BAMU?

NBDS has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBDS dropped -29.93% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, NBDS or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, NBDS leads with 32.93% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBDS or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, NBDS has performed better with a 32.93% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBDS or BAMU?

NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBDS or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.32% for NBDS.

What is the main difference between NBDS and BAMU?

NBDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NBDS and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.