NBCR vs. UNOV
NBCR (Neuberger Core Equity ETF) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NBCR is actively managed, while UNOV is passively managed. Over the past year, NBCR returned 23.29% vs 13.88% for UNOV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.
Performance
NBCR vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBCR achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.56% return.
NBCR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 13.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
NBCR vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 7.55% | 18.69% | 6.82% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.56% | 9.92% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBCR and UNOV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NBCR and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBCR vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank
NBCR
UNOV
NBCR vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBCR | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.08 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 15.01 | -5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBCR | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.50 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.92 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
NBCR vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBCR drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCR and UNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBCR | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -13.84% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -4.52% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.07% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -1.66% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 0.93% | +1.48% |
Volatility
NBCR vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.11%. This indicates that NBCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBCR | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 1.11% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 4.67% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 5.58% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 6.83% | +9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 7.72% | +8.95% |
NBCR vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBCR vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison
NBCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.47% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NBCR and UNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NBCR has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to UNOV (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCR dropped -18.23% vs UNOV's -13.84%.
On 1-year performance, NBCR leads with 23.29% vs 13.88% for UNOV. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NBCR has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.
NBCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBCR and 0.79% for UNOV.
UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBCR and UNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer