NBCR vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NBCR (Neuberger Core Equity ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NBCR returned 21.22% vs 45.01% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

NBCR vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCR achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.78% return.

NBCR

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 5.14%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 45.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBCR vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF	5.84%	18.69%	6.11%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.78%	30.93%	3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NBCR and BLCR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024	0.90

The correlation between NBCR and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBCR vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCR

NBCR Risk / Return Rank: 51
NBCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
NBCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NBCR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NBCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NBCR Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCR vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBCR	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.77	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.64	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.47	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	4.41	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	20.00	-11.30

NBCR vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCR and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBCR vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCR drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCR and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBCR	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.23%	-21.29%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.35%	-10.26%	-0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-1.02%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-2.19%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.26%	+0.19%

Volatility

NBCR vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is 4.10%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that NBCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBCR	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	6.10%	-2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	13.11%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.93%	16.38%	-4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.69%	17.65%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	17.65%	-0.96%

NBCR vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBCR vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

NBCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.28%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBCR and BLCR in my portfolio?

NBCR and BLCR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBCR or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to NBCR (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCR dropped -18.23% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, NBCR or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 45.01% vs 21.22% for NBCR. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NBCR has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBCR or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 45.01% return vs 21.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBCR or BLCR?

NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for BLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBCR or BLCR?

NBCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.28% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between NBCR and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBCR and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.