NBCR vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NBCR (Neuberger Core Equity ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, NBCR returned 17.27% vs 6.20% for BUFH. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

NBCR vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCR achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.

NBCR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 17.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 6.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBCR vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF	4.51%	12.21%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NBCR and BUFH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

NBCR vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCR

NBCR Risk / Return Rank: 46
NBCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
NBCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NBCR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
NBCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NBCR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCR vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Core Equity ETF (NBCR) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBCR	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.04	—	—

Drawdowns

NBCR vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCR drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCR and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBCR	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.23%	-1.53%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.35%	-1.53%	-8.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-0.26%	-2.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-0.18%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBCR	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	2.38%	+9.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	2.38%	+14.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.68%	2.38%	+14.30%

NBCR vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBCR vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

NBCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBCR Neuberger Core Equity ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBCR and BUFH in my portfolio?

NBCR and BUFH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBCR or BUFH?

On 1-year performance, NBCR leads with 17.27% vs 6.20% for BUFH. On fees, NBCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBCR or BUFH?

Over the 1-year period, NBCR has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBCR or BUFH?

NBCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBCR or BUFH?

NBCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between NBCR and BUFH?

NBCR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBCR and 0.95% for BUFH.