NBCE vs. MCHI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NBCE (Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF) and MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) are both China Equities funds. NBCE is actively managed, while MCHI is passively managed. Over the past year, NBCE returned 41.71% vs 0.78% for MCHI. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NBCE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCHI.

Performance

NBCE vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCE achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -6.32% return.

NBCE

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -10.16%
• 6M: 9.48%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 1Y: 41.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.47%

MCHI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 9.80%
• 6M: -8.67%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 1Y: 0.78%
• 3Y*: 7.95%
• 5Y*: -3.07%
• 10Y*: 4.02%
• ALL TIME*: 2.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	$129.39M	$142.66M	$176.09M
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	$51.90K	$60.15K	$41.04K

NBCE vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	14.31%	39.08%	3.35%	-2.22%
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	-6.32%	31.04%	17.73%	-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NBCE and MCHI is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2023	0.71

The correlation between NBCE and MCHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NBCE vs. MCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NBCE	MCHI
Technology	41.1%	13.9%
Industrials	14.7%	5.4%
Financial Services	14.3%	19.2%
Basic Materials	12.1%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	22.4%
Healthcare	3.4%	5.3%
Energy	2.4%	3.4%
Utilities	1.4%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.5%
Communication Services	0.8%	19.3%

Return for Risk

NBCE vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBCE

NBCE Risk / Return Rank: 68
NBCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NBCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
NBCE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
NBCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NBCE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MCHI

MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 12
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBCE vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBCE	MCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	0.04	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	0.20	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.02	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	0.03	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.73	0.07	+8.67

NBCE vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCE and MCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBCE vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCE and MCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBCE	MCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.42%	-62.95%	+34.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.60%	-23.22%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.15%	-36.12%	+19.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-24.67%	+15.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	11.30%	-6.51%

Volatility

NBCE vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 5.32%. This indicates that NBCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBCE	MCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.43%	5.32%	+5.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.58%	14.46%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.62%	20.59%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.02%	30.41%	-5.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.02%	27.36%	-2.34%

NBCE vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBCE vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than MCHI's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	1.96%	2.12%	2.31%	2.66%	1.78%	1.04%	1.04%	1.45%	1.60%	1.56%	1.66%	2.76%
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF	1.16%	1.32%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBCE and MCHI in my portfolio?

NBCE and MCHI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBCE or MCHI?

NBCE has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to MCHI (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBCE dropped -28.42% vs MCHI's -62.95%.

Which ETF is better, NBCE or MCHI?

On 1-year performance, NBCE leads with 41.71% vs 0.78% for MCHI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBCE or MCHI?

Over the 1-year period, NBCE has performed better with a 41.71% return vs 0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBCE or MCHI?

MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NBCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBCE or MCHI?

MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.16% for NBCE.

What is the main difference between NBCE and MCHI?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NBCE and 0.59% for MCHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.