NB vs. MTRN
NB (NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock) and MTRN (Materion Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 3 years, NB returned -0.07%/yr vs 28.16%/yr for MTRN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NB vs. MTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NB achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly lower than MTRN's 81.69% return.
NB
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.06%
- YTD
- -5.85%
- 6M
- -24.74%
- 1Y
- 92.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTRN
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 13.19%
- YTD
- 81.69%
- 6M
- 83.28%
- 1Y
- 183.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 24.37%
- 10Y*
- 25.24%
NB vs. MTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock | -5.85% | 241.94% | -51.41% | -57.86% |
MTRN Materion Corporation | 81.69% | 26.43% | -23.67% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NB and MTRN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
NB:
$679.39M
MTRN:
$4.74B
NB:
-$0.52
MTRN:
$3.65
NB:
1.56
MTRN:
4.95
NB:
$0.00
MTRN:
$1.91B
NB:
-$1.00K
MTRN:
$305.29M
NB:
-$54.65M
MTRN:
$166.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NB vs. MTRN — Risk / Return Rank
NB
MTRN
NB vs. MTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Materion Corporation (MTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NB | MTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.58 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 8.91 | -7.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 27.70 | -25.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NB | MTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 4.26 | -3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.13 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
NB vs. MTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NB drawdown since its inception was -82.83%, smaller than the maximum MTRN drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NB and MTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NB | MTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.83% | -87.53% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.10% | -20.73% | -43.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.24% | -47.84% | -27.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.24% | -1.95% | -55.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -39.68% | -16.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.72% | 6.66% | +34.06% |
Volatility
NB vs. MTRN - Volatility Comparison
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a higher volatility of 24.64% compared to Materion Corporation (MTRN) at 11.86%. This indicates that NB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NB | MTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.64% | 11.86% | +12.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.98% | 32.38% | +33.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.94% | 43.43% | +65.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.85% | 41.17% | +50.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.85% | 40.13% | +51.72% |
Dividends
NB vs. MTRN - Dividend Comparison
NB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTRN Materion Corporation | 0.25% | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.40% | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.71% | 0.73% | 0.92% | 0.81% | 0.95% | 1.27% |
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NB vs. MTRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock and Materion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NB and MTRN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NB has higher volatility (24.64%) compared to MTRN (11.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NB dropped -82.83% vs MTRN's -87.53%.
MTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NB and MTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer