NB vs. CGAU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU).

Performance

NB vs. CGAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NB vs. CGAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	-15.85%	241.94%	-51.41%	-57.86%
CGAU Centerra Gold Inc	24.14%	159.49%	-1.45%	0.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NB : $521.03M CGAU : $3.63B
EPS NB : -$0.69 CGAU : $2.82
PB Ratio NB : 1.69 CGAU : 1.77
Total Revenue (TTM) NB : $0.00 CGAU : $1.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) NB : -$1.00K CGAU : $418.41M
EBITDA (TTM) NB : -$58.87M CGAU : $680.83M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NB achieves a -15.85% return, which is significantly lower than CGAU's 24.14% return.

NB

• 1D: 6.44%
• 1M: -15.85%
• YTD: -15.85%
• 6M: -33.23%
• 1Y: 126.40%
• 3Y*: -11.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGAU

• 1D: 6.59%
• 1M: -15.17%
• YTD: 24.14%
• 6M: 66.93%
• 1Y: 186.16%
• 3Y*: 44.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NB vs. CGAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NB

NB Risk / Return Rank: 75
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CGAU

CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 96
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NB vs. CGAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NB	CGAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	3.54	-2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	3.39	-1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.48	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	7.58	-5.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	25.13	-22.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NB vs. CGAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NB Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CGAU Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NB and CGAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NB	CGAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	3.54	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.33	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between NB and CGAU is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NB vs. CGAU - Dividend Comparison

NB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGAU Centerra Gold Inc	1.14%	1.39%	3.59%	3.45%

Drawdowns

NB vs. CGAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NB drawdown since its inception was -82.83%, which is greater than CGAU's maximum drawdown of -63.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NB and CGAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NB	CGAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.83%	-63.47%	-19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.10%	-24.61%	-39.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.78%	-15.17%	-46.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.29%	-30.21%	-26.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.31%	7.43%	+29.88%

Volatility

NB vs. CGAU - Volatility Comparison

NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a higher volatility of 19.72% compared to Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) at 16.92%. This indicates that NB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NB	CGAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.72%	16.92%	+2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.03%	41.39%	+36.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.82%	52.95%	+62.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.94%	48.59%	+43.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.94%	48.59%	+43.35%

Financials