PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGAU vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGAU vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGAU vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
28.47%159.49%-1.45%19.37%-32.55%-18.30%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%14.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGAU achieves a 28.47% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return.


CGAU

1D
3.49%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
28.47%
6M
64.76%
1Y
199.43%
3Y*
46.01%
5Y*
10Y*

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGAU vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGAU vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGAUMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.79

1.01

+2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

1.56

+1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.23

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.97

1.64

+6.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.34

7.19

+19.16

CGAU vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGAU Sharpe Ratio is 3.79, which is higher than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGAU and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGAUMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79

1.01

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.56

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CGAU and MGC is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CGAU vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.10%1.39%3.59%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

CGAU vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGAU drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAU and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGAUMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-51.93%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.61%

-11.93%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.22%

-6.33%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.19%

-7.12%

-23.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.45%

2.72%

+4.73%

Volatility

CGAU vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 5.54%. This indicates that CGAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGAUMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.57%

5.54%

+11.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.41%

9.86%

+31.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.04%

18.80%

+34.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.60%

17.26%

+31.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

18.19%

+30.41%