NAWGX vs. MBXIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NAWGX (Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund) and MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - NAWGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Voya, while MBXIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, NAWGX returned 9.78%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for MBXIX. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NAWGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for MBXIX.

Performance

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NAWGX having a 12.34% return and MBXIX slightly higher at 12.91%. Over the past 10 years, NAWGX has outperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.

NAWGX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 4.13%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 1Y: 18.60%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 9.78%
• ALL TIME*: 8.42%

MBXIX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -2.01%
• 6M: 8.54%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 7.68%
• ALL TIME*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NAWGX Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAWGX Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund	12.34%	18.29%	12.15%	6.59%	-4.51%	20.66%	-1.23%	21.31%	-9.17%	24.32%
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	12.91%	4.35%	13.49%	-0.67%	7.72%	16.89%	-0.45%	13.83%	-2.16%	13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NAWGX and MBXIX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between NAWGX and MBXIX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NAWGX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAWGX

NAWGX Risk / Return Rank: 60
NAWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NAWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NAWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NAWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
NAWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MBXIX

MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAWGX	MBXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.16	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.18	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.88	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	14.92	-4.21

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAWGX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAWGX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAWGX and MBXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAWGX	MBXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.60%	-31.73%	-34.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-3.85%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	-15.59%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.73%	-15.59%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.16%	-31.73%	-3.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.68%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.52%	-3.95%	-11.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.04%	+0.76%

Volatility

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund (NAWGX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that NAWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAWGX	MBXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	1.59%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	4.89%	+9.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	6.90%	+8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	11.40%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	13.36%	+1.56%

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAWGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAWGX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

NAWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	2.25%	7.74%	0.00%	4.27%	5.18%	3.33%	3.33%	1.91%	0.00%
NAWGX Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund	4.20%	4.70%	1.85%	2.84%	3.09%	2.11%	1.99%	2.31%	3.11%	1.90%	1.38%	2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAWGX and MBXIX in my portfolio?

NAWGX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAWGX or MBXIX?

NAWGX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAWGX dropped -66.60% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.