NATO vs. DFND
NATO (Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NATO is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NATO returned 13.50% vs 0.20% for DFND. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NATO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
NATO vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NATO
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
NATO vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 1.39% | 50.95% | 0.35% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NATO and DFND is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NATO vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
NATO
DFND
NATO vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NATO | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.02 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.07 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 0.13 | +2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NATO | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.02 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.36 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
NATO vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NATO drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NATO | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -22.65% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -3.44% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.30% | -3.69% | -8.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -5.70% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.17% | 3.70% | +2.47% |
Volatility
NATO vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that NATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NATO | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 0.00% | +7.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.65% | 6.16% | +11.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 10.92% | +9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 22.46% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 19.09% | +3.52% |
NATO vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
NATO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NATO vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NATO and DFND have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NATO has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NATO dropped -15.99% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 1-year performance, NATO leads with 13.50% vs 0.20% for DFND. On fees, NATO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NATO has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NATO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.44% for NATO.
NATO is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. NATO tracks Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NATO and 1.50% for DFND.
NATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NATO and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer