NATO.L vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NATO.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NATO.L returned 17.19% vs 18.72% for NLR. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NATO.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

NATO.L vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return.

NATO.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	10.38%	54.83%	31.99%	16.64%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	26.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and NLR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.34

Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L

NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NATO.L	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.44	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.90	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	0.63	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	1.41	+1.82

NATO.L vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATO.L	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-65.05%	+52.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-29.72%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-25.81%	+21.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-35.70%	+33.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	13.33%	-8.02%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) is 7.02%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that NATO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NATO.L	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	13.73%	-6.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	33.75%	-17.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	42.85%	-22.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.14%	29.56%	-10.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.14%	24.22%	-5.08%

NATO.L vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

NATO.L vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

NATO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NATO.L and NLR in my portfolio?

NATO.L and NLR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NATO.L or NLR?

On fees, NATO.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NATO.L or NLR?

NATO.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

What is the main difference between NATO.L and NLR?

NATO.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 0.56% for NLR.