NATO.L vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NATO.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NATO.L returned 20.56% vs 0.20% for DFND. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NATO.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

NATO.L vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NATO.L

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 6M: 17.53%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	13.05%	54.83%	31.99%	16.64%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and DFND is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023	0.13

The correlation between NATO.L and DFND shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L

NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NATO.L	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.02	+1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	0.11	+1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.02	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	0.07	+1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	0.13	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NATO.L vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NATO.L	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.02	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	0.36	+1.11

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, roughly equal to the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATO.L	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.84%	-22.65%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-3.44%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-3.69%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-5.70%	+3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	3.70%	+1.55%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that NATO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NATO.L	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	0.00%	+6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.99%	6.16%	+9.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.05%	10.92%	+9.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.57%	22.46%	+5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.57%	19.09%	+8.48%

NATO.L vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NATO.L vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

NATO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NATO.L and DFND in my portfolio?

NATO.L and DFND have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NATO.L or DFND?

On fees, NATO.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NATO.L or DFND?

NATO.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

What is the main difference between NATO.L and DFND?

NATO.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 1.50% for DFND.