NASL.L vs. QQQO.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. NASL.L is passively managed, while QQQO.L is actively managed. Over the past year, NASL.L returned 41.87% vs 33.32% for QQQO.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.

Performance

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 19.92% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 15.53% return.

NASL.L

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 9.61%
• YTD: 19.92%
• 6M: 18.45%
• 1Y: 41.87%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: 19.05%
• 10Y*: —

QQQO.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 6M: 14.50%
• 1Y: 33.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR	19.92%	11.71%	16.38%
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP	15.53%	6.57%	12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NASL.L and QQQO.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024	0.64

The correlation between NASL.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASL.L

NASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
NASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
NASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
NASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QQQO.L

QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NASL.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.37	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.00	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.46	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	4.71	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	11.27	-0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASL.L and QQQO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NASL.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.37	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.18	-0.13

Drawdowns

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and QQQO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NASL.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-21.70%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-7.04%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.66%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-4.40%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.95%	+0.85%

Volatility

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that NASL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NASL.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.90%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	8.93%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.63%	14.00%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.01%	17.34%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	17.34%	+2.56%

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NASL.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.68%
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP	67.52%	124.53%	17.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NASL.L and QQQO.L in my portfolio?

NASL.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NASL.L or QQQO.L?

On fees, NASL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NASL.L or QQQO.L?

NASL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.

What is the main difference between NASL.L and QQQO.L?

They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASL.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.