NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).
NASL.L and LQQ.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NASL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. Both NASL.L and LQQ.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NASL.L or LQQ.PA.
Key characteristics
| NASL.L | LQQ.PA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.34% | 52.58% |
| 1Y Return | 31.40% | 67.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.76% | 10.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.49% | 32.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.92 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.61 | 2.59 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.49 | 2.69 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.57 | 8.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.01% | 8.07% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.79% | 32.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.49% | -75.86% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASL.L and LQQ.PA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 25.34% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 52.58% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASL.L nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and LQQ.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NASL.L vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) is 4.28%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that NASL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.