NASL.L vs. XDEV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L).
NASL.L and XDEV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NASL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. XDEV.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. Both NASL.L and XDEV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NASL.L or XDEV.L.
Key characteristics
| NASL.L | XDEV.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.36% | 3.86% |
| 1Y Return | 19.84% | 6.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.65% | 7.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.22% | 6.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | 0.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.24% | 10.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.49% | -28.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.19% | -3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASL.L and XDEV.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than XDEV.L's 3.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASL.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and XDEV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NASL.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) at 4.32%. This indicates that NASL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.