PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
-8.10%6.57%12.88%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-14.68%30.51%49.02%
Different Trading Currencies

QQQO.L is traded in GBp, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQO.L achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -14.68% return.


QQQO.L

1D
0.02%
1M
-6.86%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLI.L

1D
-2.41%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-14.68%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
55.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQO.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQO.L
QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQO.LTSLI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

1.42

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

2.00

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.93

-1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.85

7.33

-3.48

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQO.L and TSLI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQO.LTSLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

1.42

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.61

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between QQQO.L and TSLI.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.81%, more than TSLI.L's 74.76% yield.


TTM20252024
QQQO.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP
99.81%124.53%17.93%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
74.76%73.68%19.21%

Drawdowns

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQO.L drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, smaller than the maximum TSLI.L drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQO.L and TSLI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQO.LTSLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-41.20%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-21.48%

+11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.16%

-21.48%

+11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-11.65%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

7.92%

-4.71%

Volatility

QQQO.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) is 6.53%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that QQQO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQO.LTSLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

8.56%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

22.65%

-11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

39.06%

-21.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

42.91%

-24.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

42.91%

-24.72%