PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASL.L vs. MXUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NASL.L is traded in GBp, while MXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 19.92% return, which is significantly higher than MXUS.L's 10.76% return.


NASL.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
9.61%
YTD
19.92%
6M
18.45%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*

MXUS.L

1D
0.02%
1M
5.55%
YTD
10.76%
6M
10.22%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
19.92%11.71%28.78%47.95%-25.38%29.78%43.43%33.70%-2.99%
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
10.76%8.98%27.76%21.45%-10.52%29.11%17.43%26.02%-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NASL.L and MXUS.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.84

The correlation between NASL.L and MXUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NASL.L
MXUS.L

Technology

53.7%
35.4%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.6%

Industrials

3.1%
8.6%

Utilities

1.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

NASL.L
53.7%
MXUS.L
35.4%

Communication Services

NASL.L
15.8%
MXUS.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NASL.L
12.2%
MXUS.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

NASL.L
7.7%
MXUS.L
4.8%

Healthcare

NASL.L
4.2%
MXUS.L
8.6%

Industrials

NASL.L
3.1%
MXUS.L
8.6%

Utilities

NASL.L
1.4%
MXUS.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

NASL.L
1.1%
MXUS.L
1.8%

Energy

NASL.L
0.6%
MXUS.L
3.6%

Financial Services

NASL.L
0.2%
MXUS.L
11.6%

Real Estate

NASL.L
0.1%
MXUS.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASL.L
NASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MXUS.L
MXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NASL.LMXUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.80

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

12.47

-1.47

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASL.L and MXUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NASL.LMXUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.42

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.95

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.02

+0.03

Drawdowns

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, roughly equal to the maximum MXUS.L drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and MXUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASL.LMXUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-26.52%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-7.59%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-21.41%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-21.41%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.09%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-3.30%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.32%

+1.48%

Volatility

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that NASL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASL.LMXUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.47%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

8.61%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

11.90%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

15.66%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

16.66%

+3.24%

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASL.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASL.L nor MXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


NASL.L and MXUS.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASL.L.

NASL.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MXUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASL.L and 0.05% for MXUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASL.L and MXUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer