MXUS.L vs. INAA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L).
MXUS.L and INAA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXUS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. INAA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. Both MXUS.L and INAA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MXUS.L or INAA.L.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXUS.L having a 24.64% return and INAA.L slightly higher at 24.82%. Over the past 10 years, MXUS.L has underperformed INAA.L with an annualized return of 12.78%, while INAA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.56% annualized return.
MXUS.L
24.64%
0.97%
11.73%
33.15%
15.37%
12.78%
INAA.L
24.82%
4.13%
11.92%
29.90%
15.15%
14.56%
Key characteristics
| MXUS.L | INAA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.76 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.80 | 3.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.52 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.08 | 4.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.59 | 19.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.83% | 1.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.68% | 11.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.38% | -35.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.82% | -1.05% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INAA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and INAA.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Dividend Comparison
MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS | 0.77% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.32% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.21% | 1.49% |
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum INAA.L drawdown of -35.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and INAA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. INAA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that MXUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.