NASA vs. WDGF
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. NASA is actively managed, while WDGF is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDGF.
Performance
NASA vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDGF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 34.77% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and WDGF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and WDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -14.36% | -11.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.46% | -11.68% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -5.72% | +0.01% |
Volatility
NASA vs. WDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 22.67% | +46.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.70% | 22.67% | +46.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.70% | 22.67% | +46.03% |
NASA vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and WDGF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
WDGF has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.45% for WDGF.
Find the right allocation for NASA and WDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer