NASA vs. WDAF
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. NASA is actively managed, while WDAF is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDAF.
Performance
NASA vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -36.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 10.29% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and WDAF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than WDAF's maximum drawdown of -20.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and WDAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -20.63% | -16.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.55% | -20.63% | -15.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -6.89% | -2.04% |
Volatility
NASA vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.98% | 32.58% | +34.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.98% | 32.58% | +34.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.98% | 32.58% | +34.40% |
NASA vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and WDAF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.45% for WDAF.
Find the right allocation for NASA and WDAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer