NAPR vs. QB
NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
NAPR vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NAPR having a 10.51% return and QB slightly lower at 10.47%.
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 5.44% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.47% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAPR and QB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
NAPR vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NAPR
QB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NAPR
QB
Communication Services
NAPR
QB
Consumer Cyclical
NAPR
QB
Consumer Defensive
NAPR
QB
Healthcare
NAPR
QB
Industrials
NAPR
QB
Utilities
NAPR
QB
Basic Materials
NAPR
QB
Energy
NAPR
QB
Financial Services
NAPR
QB
Real Estate
NAPR
QB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAPR vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank
NAPR
QB
NAPR vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAPR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAPR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 3.17 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
NAPR vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAPR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -1.83% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.30% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -0.34% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | — | — |
Volatility
NAPR vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAPR | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 5.75% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 5.75% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 5.75% | +4.86% |
NAPR vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAPR vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAPR and QB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.
NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 0.58% for QB.
Find the right allocation for NAPR and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer