PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAPR vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAPR vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NAPR having a 10.51% return and QB slightly lower at 10.47%.


NAPR

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.51%
6M
11.15%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAPR vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and QB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.73

NAPR vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NAPR
QB

Technology

50.7%
49.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
8.6%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.3%

Industrials

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.3%

Energy

0.7%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

NAPR
50.7%
QB
49.9%

Communication Services

NAPR
15.8%
QB
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NAPR
12.5%
QB
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

NAPR
8.7%
QB
8.6%

Healthcare

NAPR
5.1%
QB
5.3%

Industrials

NAPR
3.3%
QB
3.7%

Utilities

NAPR
1.6%
QB
1.6%

Basic Materials

NAPR
1.3%
QB
1.3%

Energy

NAPR
0.7%
QB
0.6%

Financial Services

NAPR
0.2%
QB
0.2%

Real Estate

NAPR
0.1%
QB
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAPR vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAPRQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

84.84

NAPR vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAPRQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

3.17

-2.10

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAPRQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-1.83%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.30%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-0.34%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

Volatility

NAPR vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAPRQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

5.75%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

5.75%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.61%

5.75%

+4.86%

NAPR vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAPR vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NAPR and QB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.

NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAPR and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer