NANR vs. XME
NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NANR is a Natural Resources fund tracking the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NANR returned 11.78%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for XME. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
NANR vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than XME's 5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 11.78%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.
NANR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 13.32%
- 6M
- 11.98%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
XME
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -11.28%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 66.55%
- 3Y*
- 31.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.46%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
NANR vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 13.32% | 35.35% | 2.31% | -3.23% | 26.49% | 36.43% | 1.03% | 18.99% | -16.77% | 8.03% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 5.09% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANR and XME is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between NANR and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
NANR vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NANR
XME
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
NANR
XME
Energy
NANR
XME
Consumer Cyclical
NANR
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
NANR
XME
Real Estate
NANR
XME
-
Industrials
NANR
XME
Technology
NANR
XME
Utilities
NANR
XME
-
Communication Services
NANR
-
XME
-
Financial Services
NANR
-
XME
-
Healthcare
NANR
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NANR vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
NANR
XME
NANR vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NANR | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.96 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 7.11 | +4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NANR vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANR | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -85.89% | +36.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -22.60% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -30.47% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -37.27% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.15% | -61.69% | +12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.81% | -18.08% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -44.04% | +35.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 9.39% | -6.24% |
Volatility
NANR vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is 7.27%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that NANR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NANR | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 13.63% | -6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | 28.38% | -12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 36.53% | -17.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 32.77% | -9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 32.92% | -9.32% |
NANR vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NANR and XME have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
NANR vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than XME's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.85% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NANR and XME have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to NANR (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANR dropped -49.15% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.64% vs 11.78% for NANR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 7.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.64% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANR and XME have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.34% for XME.
NANR is categorized as Natural Resources, while XME is Materials. NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index.
NANR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NANR and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer