NANR vs. LIT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).

NANR and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NANR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2015. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both NANR and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NANR vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NANR vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	23.68%	35.35%	2.31%	-3.23%	26.49%	36.43%	1.03%	18.99%	-16.77%	8.03%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	14.77%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 14.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 14.17%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.

NANR

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 23.68%
• 6M: 30.97%
• 1Y: 53.36%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: 14.17%

LIT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 6M: 29.65%
• 1Y: 94.01%
• 3Y*: 6.33%
• 5Y*: 5.28%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANR vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

NANR

SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

Return for Risk

NANR vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANR

NANR Risk / Return Rank: 93
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 96
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANR vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NANR	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.74	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.31	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.44	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	5.29	-1.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.72	20.38	-4.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NANR vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANR Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANR and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NANR	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.74	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.17	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.49	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.24	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NANR and LIT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NANR vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than LIT's 0.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	1.43%	1.77%	2.20%	2.78%	2.70%	2.61%	2.73%	2.02%	1.95%	1.83%	5.01%	0.01%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.42%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Drawdowns

NANR vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NANR	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.15%	-65.91%	+16.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-17.61%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.42%	-65.91%	+39.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.15%	-65.91%	+16.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-19.76%	+17.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-33.90%	+25.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	4.57%	-1.13%

Volatility

NANR vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is 5.37%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that NANR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NANR	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	9.75%	-4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.56%	24.73%	-9.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.03%	34.53%	-11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.10%	31.66%	-8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	30.50%	-6.76%