NANC vs. CVSE
NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) and CVSE (Calvert US Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NANC returned 23.86%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for CVSE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NANC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CVSE.
Performance
NANC vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NANC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 23.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NANC vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 10.06% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 20.79% |
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.00% | 10.14% | 19.11% | 12.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANC and CVSE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NANC and CVSE has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NANC vs. CVSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NANC
CVSE
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
NANC
CVSE
Communication Services
NANC
CVSE
Healthcare
NANC
CVSE
Consumer Cyclical
NANC
CVSE
Financial Services
NANC
CVSE
Consumer Defensive
NANC
CVSE
Industrials
NANC
CVSE
Basic Materials
NANC
CVSE
Utilities
NANC
CVSE
Energy
NANC
-
CVSE
-
Real Estate
NANC
-
CVSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NANC vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank
NANC
CVSE
NANC vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NANC | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.66 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 5.71 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NANC | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.28 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.92 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
NANC vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, roughly equal to the maximum CVSE drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and CVSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANC | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -20.29% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -3.08% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | -20.29% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.68% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -2.69% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.42% | +1.53% |
Volatility
NANC vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NANC | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 0.00% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 0.00% | +10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 6.49% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 13.87% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 13.87% | +2.85% |
NANC vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NANC vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison
NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than CVSE's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.81% | 1.05% | 1.22% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NANC and CVSE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NANC has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to CVSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs CVSE's -20.29%.
On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 23.86% vs 13.34% for CVSE. On fees, CVSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CVSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 23.86% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.
CVSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.
They also come from different issuers: Subversive and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.29% for CVSE.
NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NANC and CVSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer