PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAN vs. NMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAN vs. NMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAN achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 11.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NAN having a 2.44% annualized return and NMI not far ahead at 2.55%.


NAN

1D
0.09%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.94%
6M
3.57%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
2.44%

NMI

1D
1.25%
1M
11.12%
YTD
11.65%
6M
11.63%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAN vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAN
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.94%6.57%10.20%7.72%-24.07%9.00%4.17%20.91%-7.22%8.45%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
11.65%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%-8.07%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NAN and NMI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 1999

0.21

The correlation between NAN and NMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAN vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAN
NAN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAN vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANNMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.53

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

3.59

+2.52

NAN vs. NMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the NMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAN and NMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANNMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.19

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.17

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.34

+0.02

Drawdowns

NAN vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAN drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, which is greater than NMI's maximum drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAN and NMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANNMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.96%

-28.92%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-10.96%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-14.54%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-28.92%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-28.92%

-5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.06%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-5.92%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.65%

-2.97%

Volatility

NAN vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) is 2.18%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that NAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANNMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

7.35%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

13.32%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

15.90%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.34%

14.46%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

14.93%

-3.77%

NAN vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAN has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAN vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison

NAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than NMI's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAN
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.47%7.67%6.45%4.12%5.27%4.15%4.30%4.06%4.79%5.13%5.74%5.54%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.19%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAN and NMI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMI has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to NAN (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAN dropped -44.96% vs NMI's -28.92%.

NAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAN and NMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer