PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAN vs. MMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAN vs. MMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAN achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than MMU's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NAN has outperformed MMU with an annualized return of 2.44%, while MMU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.28% annualized return.


NAN

1D
0.09%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.94%
6M
3.57%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
2.44%

MMU

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.64%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAN vs. MMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAN
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.94%6.57%10.20%7.72%-24.07%9.00%4.17%20.91%-7.22%8.45%
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
0.21%9.19%6.58%5.63%-19.58%5.83%0.71%10.08%-4.55%8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NAN and MMU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 1999

0.29

The correlation between NAN and MMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAN vs. MMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAN
NAN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MMU
MMU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAN vs. MMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANMMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.87

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

6.56

-0.45

NAN vs. MMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the MMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAN and MMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANMMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.04

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.10

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.37

-0.01

Drawdowns

NAN vs. MMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAN drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, which is greater than MMU's maximum drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAN and MMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANMMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.96%

-34.51%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-5.88%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-12.86%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-31.89%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-34.51%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-6.81%

+5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-6.83%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.68%

0.00%

Volatility

NAN vs. MMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) is 2.18%, while Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that NAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANMMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

2.39%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

7.10%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

8.31%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.34%

10.68%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

13.01%

-1.85%

NAN vs. MMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAN has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MMU's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NAN vs. MMU - Dividend Comparison

NAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than MMU's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
6.42%6.26%6.16%4.36%4.65%3.88%4.21%4.96%5.68%5.37%5.67%5.50%
NAN
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.47%7.67%6.45%4.12%5.27%4.15%4.30%4.06%4.79%5.13%5.74%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAN and MMU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMU has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to NAN (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAN dropped -44.96% vs MMU's -34.51%.

NAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAN and MMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer