NAMAX vs. CIMDX
NAMAX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund) and CIMDX (Clarkston Founders Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NAMAX returned 12.63%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for CIMDX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NAMAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CIMDX.
Performance
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMAX achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's 1.81% return.
NAMAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 1Y
- 35.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
CIMDX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- —
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 23.83% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -18.46% | 12.25% |
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 1.81% | 7.35% | 5.67% | 10.38% | -3.67% | 6.23% | 23.21% | 23.74% | -7.85% | 11.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMAX and CIMDX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NAMAX and CIMDX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMAX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank
NAMAX
CIMDX
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMAX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.10 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 0.75 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.62 | 1.73 | +14.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMAX and CIMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMAX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.44% | -31.86% | -28.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -11.83% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -14.82% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -15.58% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -2.03% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -5.91% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 5.12% | -2.95% |
Volatility
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) is 3.62%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that NAMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMAX | CIMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 8.27% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 14.32% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 17.82% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 16.35% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 17.63% | +2.36% |
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAMAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAMAX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison
NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than CIMDX's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 3.19% | 3.24% | 0.45% | 1.62% | 6.38% | 0.44% | 0.91% | 3.32% | 2.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.02% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMAX and CIMDX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIMDX has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to NAMAX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMAX dropped -60.44% vs CIMDX's -31.86%.
NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMAX and CIMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer