PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMAX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMAX achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 14.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NAMAX having a 11.78% annualized return and FSMDX not far ahead at 12.12%.


NAMAX

1D
1.10%
1M
5.16%
YTD
22.50%
6M
21.50%
1Y
37.60%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
11.78%

FSMDX

1D
0.53%
1M
3.31%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.50%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
22.50%13.77%13.14%9.65%-9.33%32.28%6.90%31.56%-18.46%13.71%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.03%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMAX and FSMDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between NAMAX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMAX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMAX
NAMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NAMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAMAXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.30

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

2.90

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.02

11.11

+6.91

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMAX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMAX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMAXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.44%

-40.35%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-8.16%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-20.92%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-26.07%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

-40.35%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-4.94%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.13%

+0.04%

Volatility

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMAXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.43%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

10.46%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

13.85%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

18.32%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

19.35%

+0.74%

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAMAX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than FSMDX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.97%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
6.08%6.71%7.07%0.74%6.39%8.99%3.22%3.38%27.38%21.08%8.07%17.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NAMAX and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NAMAX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FSMDX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMAX dropped -60.44% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMAX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer