NAGE vs. GTX
NAGE (Niagen Bioscience, Inc) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. NAGE operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, NAGE returned -17.39%/yr vs 32.32%/yr for GTX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NAGE vs. GTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAGE achieves a -45.91% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 86.73% return.
NAGE
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -30.22%
- YTD
- -45.91%
- 6M
- -47.32%
- 1Y
- -70.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- -17.39%
- 10Y*
- -5.02%
GTX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 29.68%
- YTD
- 86.73%
- 6M
- 94.66%
- 1Y
- 224.03%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 32.32%
- 10Y*
- —
NAGE vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGE Niagen Bioscience, Inc | -45.91% | 19.89% | 270.98% | -14.88% | -55.08% | -22.08% | 11.37% | 25.66% | -8.78% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 86.73% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | -55.66% | -19.04% | -35.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAGE and GTX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018 | 0.14 |
The correlation between NAGE and GTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NAGE:
$290.91M
GTX:
$6.25B
NAGE:
$0.22
GTX:
$1.72
NAGE:
15.78
GTX:
18.81
NAGE:
0.13
GTX:
0.15
NAGE:
2.25
GTX:
2.38
NAGE:
$130.42M
GTX:
$2.71B
NAGE:
$83.83M
GTX:
$855.00M
NAGE:
$13.37M
GTX:
$452.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAGE vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank
NAGE
GTX
NAGE vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Niagen Bioscience, Inc (NAGE) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAGE | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 1.81 | -1.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 11.35 | -12.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 36.89 | -38.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAGE | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.36 | 4.73 | -6.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.78 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
NAGE vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAGE drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAGE and GTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAGE | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.00% | -93.08% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.13% | -19.87% | -56.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.13% | -26.82% | -49.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.71% | -32.07% | -56.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -4.37% | -77.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.72% | -51.03% | -24.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.25% | 6.10% | +46.15% |
Volatility
NAGE vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison
Niagen Bioscience, Inc (NAGE) has a higher volatility of 20.67% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 14.73%. This indicates that NAGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAGE | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.67% | 14.73% | +5.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.51% | 34.81% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.25% | 47.66% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.24% | 41.55% | +35.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.01% | 64.00% | +16.01% |
Dividends
NAGE vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison
NAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.93% | 1.49% |
NAGE Niagen Bioscience, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NAGE vs. GTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Niagen Bioscience, Inc and Garrett Motion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NAGE and GTX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAGE has higher volatility (20.67%) compared to GTX (14.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAGE dropped -97.00% vs GTX's -93.08%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.73 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAGE and GTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer