NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and XNDX.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NADQ.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while XNDX.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XNDX.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NADQ.DE having a 20.63% return and XNDX.DE slightly higher at 20.67%.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
XNDX.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 11.34% |
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD | 20.67% | -4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
XNDX.DE
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.53 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and XNDX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -20.11% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.82% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -10.66% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 31.84% | -16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 31.84% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 31.84% | -12.30% |
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than XNDX.DE's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NADQ.DE and XNDX.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XNDX.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XNDX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.18% for XNDX.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and XNDX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer